TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:In house publishing and binding From:Beth Friedman <bjf -at- WAVEFRONT -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:25:33 -0500
At 04:05 PM 7/16/99 -0400, Joan Melgaard wrote:
>For those of you that publish materials in house or do short production
>runs, do you have any recommendations for either comb binding systems
>(plastic or metal) or spiral binding systems (plastic or metal)? Do you
>print on paper sizes other than 8 1/2 x 11?
Though metal combs (they have a different name that I can't remember) and
spiral binding are nifty, comb binding is much more practical. It's much
quicker to do, uses less expensive equipment, and comb-bound documents are
much easier to add or delete pages from if you have any sort of printing
glitch.
--
"UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are."
Beth Friedman
bjf -at- wavefront -dot- com
