TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Reply on top or bottom: Was "In" the field or "On" the field
Subject:Reply on top or bottom: Was "In" the field or "On" the field From:Kathleen Frost <frostdoc -at- EARTHLINK -dot- NET> Date:Sat, 14 Aug 1999 13:13:37 -0400
Ed Gregory wrote:
>>The socially accepted standard method for replying to email is to put your
>>response at the top, followed by a snippet or summary of the original.
>>This is because anybody following the thread has already seen the
original.
>>Burying your reply at the bottom, like this, forces many people to reread
material they''ve already read or hit the DELETE key.
I have to disagree. I see about the same number of messages both ways. Not
enough of one method or the other for one to be considered "socially
acceptable." Snippets or summaries are either in quotes or marked with
angle brackets (>>) so it is quickly obvious that the material set off is
from the original message.
On my other lists, the "snippet" is almost always listed first (more of a
personal preference than any list wide preference) so everyone knows what
previous post you are replying to. Of course, on those lists, there are
subject tags, like CHAT, TOOLS, GENRE, etc. to help you filter your messages
during download, or to allow a sort by subject, so you can decide if you
want to bother with the thread.