TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Does a Professional Tech Writer need to follow the Chicago nual of Style?
Subject:Re: Does a Professional Tech Writer need to follow the Chicago nual of Style? From:Mary Paliotta <Mary -at- AMAREX -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:29:31 -0400
Wouldn't everyone agree that applying rules which allow the author to be
precise (and eliminate various possibilities) with the meaning of the text
is the most important priority? And then after that question has been
addressed, on a secondary level, make style decisions based on consistency
etc. so that the text reads much more easily and clearer for your audience?
For me, I would say there is no question about this.
Mary
-----Original Message-----
From: DHICKEY -at- ALIS -dot- COM [mailto:DHICKEY -at- ALIS -dot- COM]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 1999 4:18 PM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: Does a Professional Tech Writer need to follow the Chicago
Manual of Style?
Greetings!
I just got into a discussion with a fellow tech writer about Style Guides.
Now I have my own style guide which is an amalgamation of styles which has
been hammered into me by a variety of editors over the years. This style
guide isn't really published anywhere. It's just the way I tend to write and
the rules I choose to use to govern style and layout.
I own a few style guides, and when it comes to a conflict on what to use, I
consult each one until I find a convention that works for me. I don't really
like conforming to one rule just because it comes from "The Chicago Manual
of Style". It may not apply in my case or even to technical writing in
general!
For example (and please don't start a thread on this!), I like to use the
serial comma. I think it's cleaner and clearer. Let's say you have a
sentence like: "Eric revoked the posting priviledges of Andrew, David,
George, and Jane." If you don't put a comma before the "and", George and
Jane become an implied grouping like they're a couple or something. That's
my take on it. But if the Chicago Manual of Style says you should never use
a serial comma, should I bleat and just accept it? I think not.
But is this a professional attitude? Should I be relying on one particular
(published) style guide when creating documents? Or is it more important to
use your own rules consistently and wisely? What is considered more
professional?
--
Be seeing you,
Dave
---------------------------------------------
John David Hickey
Montreal, Quebec, Canada eh?
They say that the pen is mightier than the sword.
But if you miss a deadline, you'd better bring the sword.
---------------------------------------------
Don't confuse my opinion with my employer's.
Each exists in blissful ignorance of the other.
