TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Reasons not to use the Courier font From:Mark Giffin <mgiffin -at- earthlink -dot- net> To:TECHWR-L -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com Date:Sat, 02 Oct 1999 11:09:49 -0700
Mark Levinson wrote about clients wanting to use Courier:
>My advice would be first, to understand that though they are
>distorted by the resonance of personal experience, your client's
>feelings are sincere-- like, for example, the feelings of
>someone who believes Neil Young has talent.
This is rich. The Courier font of musicians. Neil Young was making noise a
few years ago about how lacking in integrity were those artists who were
selling their songs for use in ads, such as a Phil Collins song in a beer
commercial. Maybe it was because there were no good offers for Neil Young
songs? ("Cinnamon Girl" as the theme for a local used car lot?)
But funny as that thought is, I still like both of them, and wouldn't claim
they had no talent. God Bless Courier. It is, to me, the least pretentious
of fonts (Salt of the Fonts) and I use it heavily in stuff like printed
memos and anywhere else I can sneak it in. It's possible that it makes it
easier to see the quality of the writing. We are presentation crazy these
days. I believe the world could get by with about 4 fonts, instead of
400,000 and growing. I would take Courier with me to a desert island.