TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Any ideas for a presentation on the documentation process?
Subject:Re: Any ideas for a presentation on the documentation process? From:"Anthony Markatos" <tonymar -at- hotmail -dot- com> To:KVanlaan -at- verisign -dot- com, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com Date:Sat, 23 Oct 1999 10:24:28 PDT
Krista Van Laan asks:
I and a writer in my group are going to give a presentation on the
documentation process to the engineers ...... Has anyone had any luck doing
the same thing or any ideas on how to make it interesting?
Tony Markatos responds:
I have done this many-a-time. The best way is to draw parallels between
what (software) engineers do and what technical writers do. There are a
lot! A couple of examples:
1.) Software engineers perform a Systems Analysis. Tech Writers perform a
Task Analysis. These are really the same thing: specifying noun/verb
combinations that state what the system does. While, Engineers call these
combinations "functions" and Tech Writers call them "Tasks", the differences
are just cultural. "Calculate Sales Tax", "Staple Form X to Form Y",
"Determine Time Available", and "Visit Grandma" (providing that doing such
is within the scope of the system under consideration) can be called either
tasks or functions. No difference.
2.) Good design for both software and end user manuals is characterized by
minimum interface complexity between parts of the whole. Good software
design has a minimum number of "go-to's" between modules. Good
documentation design has a minimum number of "skips" (skip over material to
get what you really need) and "jump-to's" (jump from one section to another
to find what you need).
3.) Standardization of terminology is just as important in an end user
manual as it is in a logical data dictionary.
I can go on-and-on, but you get the picture.
Tony Markatos
(tonymar -at- hotmail -dot- com)
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com