TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Newbie in Houston? From:Christi Carew <christi -at- sageinst -dot- COM> To:pix_l -at- geocities -dot- com Date:Tue, 09 Nov 1999 10:08:04 -0800
I hope this isn't too late, I was on vacation for a few days. My coupela
cents worth...
April wrote:
><<Also, I'm interested in knowing what I need to be marketable in
>this field. I only have a 2-year degree, so I'm starting back to
>school in the spring. What major(s) would you recommend?>>
Geoff wrote:
>Depends what your degree is in, and how hung up local companies
>are on getting people with degrees. If the degree isn't in technical
>communication, you may have more trouble finding work; if it is,
>going back to school may be less important than having a good
>track record and marketable skills. Speaking of which:
I add:
I'd say that experience tends to be more valuable than school, at least
around here (Silicon Valley). I started getting my certificate in TW a
couple of years ago and (for various reasons) have had to stretch it out.
However, not actually having the certificate has never prevented me from
getting a job. Typically (earlier on) any reservations were about
experience (or the lack of).
April continued to write:
><<Lastly, I'm thinking of buying and teaching myself a page layout
>program because the positions I seek inevitably require experience
>with either Pagemaker or Framemaker. Which one would you
>recommend and is learning one synonymous with learning the
>other? >>
Geoff continued to write:
>Much though I love PageMaker, it's Frame (or Word) that rules the
>documentation roost. If you can only learn one, make it Frame.
>(That's assuming you already know Word; if you don't, then take
>some time to get good at it too. Knowing at least one of the two
>packages seems to be pretty much a prerequisite for working in
>tech. comm. these days.) Although basic layout skills tend to
>transfer well between programs, PM and Frame are sufficiently
>different that learning one won't give you what you need to work
>immediately in the other; in particular, Frame uses a different
>metaphor, has a steeper learning curve, and requires more
>discipline to use properly (PM tends to be more free-form).
I continue to add:
I would agree that Frame "rules the documentation roost". However, I would
claim that Frame is easier to learn than PageMaker. I think you'd get
varying opinions from everyone. I would also agree that the skills of
learning one aren't really transferrable to the other, but becoming more
familiar and comfortable with using computer programs in general usually
makes learning a new program a little easier each time.
Christi Carew
Technical Writer
christi -at- sageinst -dot- com
p. 831-761-6565
f. 831-761-2452
Sage Instruments
240 Airport Blvd.
Freedom, CA 95019
www.sageinst.com
Christi Carew
Technical Writer
christi -at- sageinst -dot- com
p. 831-761-6565
f. 831-761-2452
Sage Instruments
240 Airport Blvd.
Freedom, CA 95019
www.sageinst.com
"If you can't explain it to an 8-year-old, you don't understand it"
-Albert Einstein