TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Midol Moment or National Tragedy? You decide...
Subject:RE: Midol Moment or National Tragedy? You decide... From:"Brierley, Sean" <Sean -at- Quodata -dot- Com> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 11 Nov 1999 16:44:10 -0500
Hallo:
Doesn't one typo per page represent an accuracy rate approaching 99.99%?
Wouldn't you be appreciative if your car or the software had that same
quality? (Actually, my new Subaru has a mis-labelled windshield washer
control.)
Anyway, could it be that the software company is using an SME to write the
books . . . someone who is less than thrilled about the job of writing. Such
typos are often caught by spellcheck, then by an editor, and lastly at least
in a review of the blues.
Certainly, there might possibly have been a conflict between doing it right
and shipping by a deadline that caused a couple of reviews of the doc to
slide . . . we've all been there (actually, I am visiting that very place
all week). I recommend you keep a bottle of 18-yr old Glen Livet in your
desk drawer and take a swig each time you find an error. That ought ease
your pain better than Midol <vbg>.
Thoughts?
Sean
sean -at- quodata -dot- com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Metzger Karen [SMTP:Metzger_Karen -at- prc -dot- com]
>
> Could it be that, without even looking for them, at least one typo PER
> PAGE
> has reared its ugly head? That faux pas such as "You will see the same
> thing
> in you code," "This system are affected," and "Be careful not to move to
> quickly" are rampant? That somehow in recent years even book publishers
> seem
> to be dispensing with editors as an unnecessary luxury?
>
>