TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: FW: What alternatives are there to "Information Mapping"?
Subject:RE: FW: What alternatives are there to "Information Mapping"? From:Kathleen Kuvinka <kkuvinka -at- epicor -dot- com> To:"'Mark Baker'" <mbaker -at- omnimark -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 22 Nov 1999 18:57:16 -0800
> But to really
> know how a page is designed, you have examine the page
> closely. That takes
> more than two seconds. In fact, it takes longer than reading
> a page of plain
> text.
Maybe, but I doubt it. Even so, after you learn how the simple table that we
were referring to is set up, you can quickly find the info over and over
again. I did concede that IM is not for everything, so no need to call me
out there.
> The virtue of simple linear page design is that it does not tend to
> encourage skipping and skimming. If people do skip and skim to find
> information, at least the relationships between pieces of
> information are
> clearly expressed in liner prose that they have no choice but
> to read. It
> may take people longer to get information, but it is more
> likely to be the
> correct information.
Are you really suggesting that all info be presented in the format of a
simple linear page? It does not encourage skimming? Could you support this
assertion somehow?
> Glibly encouraging people of limited
> experience to
> try high wire design tricks with their information does not
> strike me as
> particularly responsible.
>
I'm sorry, we were talking about a simple three column table that would
probably be used by a manager or HR personnel. We're not trying to change
the world.