TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: adobe poor representation at conference/ exhibitors in genera l
Subject:RE: adobe poor representation at conference/ exhibitors in genera l From:jknebel -at- ospreyus -dot- com To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com Date:Fri, 26 May 2000 14:46:09 -0400
I agree with John. I think that Adobe's "booth" did them more of dis-service
than not showing up would have.
Overall, I was disappointed in the exhibit floor. About 50% of the
exhibitors were Translation vendors, and there were less than fifty
exhibitors. Personally, I don't use translation services right now. I was
hoping to see many more vendors with established booths.
I also agree Jo Byrd that they closed down the exhibit floor way too early.
That probably caused a good portion of vendors to not come to the
conference.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Prince [mailto:JPrince -at- e-talkcorp -dot- com]
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 2:09 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: adobe poor representation at conference
A bit of a follow up on a question asked last week about if Adobe would be
at
the STC conference.
Well, they were - but they weren't.
Now I'm not here to bash adobe (Frame is my favorite software of all time).
I
just thought I would share my experience with them at the conference.
The booth was the worst booth (by far) at the conference. No spectaculars,
no
"goodies", just a computer and a few press releases. That's fine, except it
really stood out as being odd to have such a poor exhibit (especially for a
company that's as big a player in our industry as Adobe).
The exhibitor (while being very cute) knew little about her own product.
Turns
out she's in Marketing. I wanted some info on Frame-XML. Adobe obviously
taught
her a few "buzz-words" like well-formed, validation, DTD, etc. However, when
I
asked to see the source code for the XSL style sheet, her wheels shot off. I
had
to get on the computer and start using it myself (and it was nice of her to
let
me do it). I don't fault her, I fault Adobe. Don't send a Marketer by
herself.
At least send along a Sales Engineer. I went to ArborText's booth and when
the
sales rep couldn't answer my question, he introduced me to someone at the
booth
who could. This woman knew more about XML than anyone I've ever met. She was
telling me how someone at her company wrote the DOM spec for XML, etc.
The worst part is that on Monday (I wanted to show my boss Frame 6.0) I went
to
the Adobe exhibit, the girl was gone. The setup (if you want to call it
that)
was still there, although the computer was turned off. I asked someone in
the
booth next to her if he had seen her and he hadn't.
So all in all, I was *very* disappointed in their "presence" at the
conference.
It's a good thing that I am already a big fan of Frame, because I don't see
how
they picked up any new customers at the conference.
To Sarah O'Keefe, I saw your note on the bulletin board and I'm sorry I
couldn't
hook up with other Framers that evening. However, I'm glad to see my fellow
FUN
members were able to get together and discuss the greatness of FrameMaker.