TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Managing the multitudes (workflow management) From:KMcLauchlan -at- chrysalis-its -dot- com To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 8 Mar 2001 13:37:49 -0500
Well, well, WELL then!.... It happens that we are in the
process of implementing ClearCase and ClearQuest at this company.
As a matter of fact, I'll be using one product --
if they EVER get the system up (we took the courses last
November and the servers STILL aren't up) to version-control
and back-up my FrameMaker docs, while the engineers are
using it to control the development code. They'll use the
other Rational product for bug/issue tracking. The Customer
Support folk, however, are using something from Great Pains...
er, I mean Plains, which is part of the new system being used
by finance and Sales.
Indeedy! Replace incompatible systems with... incompatible
systems.
Anyway, that was another reason I was thinking of SQL.
Ellen, on the other hand, made a good case for the simplicity
of Access.
I must think on this some more (that will be the grinding noise
that you hear).
/kevin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pitt, Julie [mailto:julie -dot- pitt -at- digex -dot- com]
[snip]
> We're adapting Rational tools to our implementation of an ISO
> 9000-compliant
> quality management system. Rose has been great for process
> mapping, and we
> plan to use ClearCase for documentation management and
> ClearQuest for a
> couple of our processes that require tracking an activity
> through various
> stages. As part of our document management plan, we're going
> to have a Web
> interface to a shared directory--everyone in the department
> will have at
> least read access to all projects. It's not all implemented
> yet, but looks
> very promising thus far.
> As for Kevin's quandary, Rational might be a way to go, but
> it would take a
> lot of planning, and probably buy-in from the whole
> Engineering group to
> really make it work well. One plus is that Rational includes
> the Rational
> Unified Process, so that the various parts of a project can
> be linked across
> the tool set; and, it allegedly allows you to attach e-mail
> messages to
> project documents. It's also integrated with Word, and
> possibly (I can't
> remember for sure) with Microsoft Project.
IPCC 01, the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference,
October 24-27, 2001 at historic La Fonda in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
CALL FOR PAPERS OPEN UNTIL MARCH 15. http://ieeepcs.org/2001/
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.