TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Make it Pretty for the SMEs You Want to Interview
Subject:Re: Make it Pretty for the SMEs You Want to Interview From:NarrWriter -at- aol -dot- com To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 18 May 2001 11:07:56 EDT
Though you would not think so, there are a few professionals who are insecure
and translate that tremulous state into seeming disrespect for the people
that transform what they say into readable or listenable form. How many times
have you heard, 'Oh, I'll just write that up, it's easy."? Then easy becomes
difficult when the words don't flow quite as simply as they thought they
would.
A lot of what I do takes the written work of scientists and present it to
sales or stockholders or at conferences in either written or mostly video
format. Over the years I have met a general behavior I'll call the I know
more than you syndrome. During the interview there are all kinds of
qualifications and admonitions. There are sometimes little agonies over
descriptions or objections to a particular suggested analogy. I think this
comes form the fear that there will be either misinterpretations or
misunderstandings. I assure them, at this stage, that we will work together
to get every detail correct. Sometimes this helps.
When the project/script is ready, I'll give it back to the person I'm working
with for review. There might be an objection about the subject treatment
being too simple - to which I might respond with a discussion of how to bring
complex information to an audience with less comprehension of the subject
matter than the scientific community. I might even give the person a video or
two and let them hear for themselves. The point is there are always going to
be people who think that writers don't do all that much or know all that
much, in spite of the fact that Hollywood and television were shaking in
their Guccis from the threat of a strike by the WGA.
It takes an experienced mature individual to understand the reality of a well
written project/script and they don't seem to be making as many of them as
they used to.
If you are given a person of lesser light with whom to work, do the best you
can to help them. The idea is to get through each job and on to the next. I
always share the credit with the scientists or the experts who work with me.
When they see the final form of the project or the video and the credits
roll, their attitude is usually changed and on the next job the work flow is
much easier.
We're not only writers, sometimes we have to be psychologists, confessors,
and hopefully collaborators. If you are able to concentrate on the project
and not the personality, you can usually get through and come out the other
side.
Rodger Parsons
NarrWriter - Voicing the Written Word
*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com
Sponsored by Information Mapping, Inc., a professional services firm
specializing in Knowledge Management and e-content solutions. See http://www.infomap.com or 800-463-6627 for more about our solutions.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.