TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
1 - You will get to associate with a bunch of religious bigots who think
you're interested in their subjective and not-too-helpful opinions/funny
little comments.
OUCH!!! OK - please don't flame me too much!
In fact, I'm a Frame Weenie, myself. My reasons - not in particular
order, and probably not 10 of them:
Predictable results - Maker doesn't try to do things for me, so it
doesn't surprise me with it's guess at what I want. Also, it seems to
be more solid in terms of data integrity all around. I have a heck of a
time figuring out what Word will do next.
Books - Master Documents in Word are broken, according to the Word
community. A Maker book is a collection of document files, with some
rules for handling them as a unit - numbering, blank left-pages, etc.
For long documents, this is quite useful.
Marker interface - People say the FrameMaker interface is hard to learn.
However, I have yet to make sense out of Word's bookmarks, and
whatever the other equivalents are. In other words, cross-references,
index entries, and other meta-data that you store in the document are
easier to deal with in Maker.
HTML output - Maker gives you native functionality to manage the HTML
output pretty darned well. You can split long docs or books into
sub-pages. You can include calls to JavaScript or Java files. It's
pretty impressive, and much cheaper than 3rd Party HTML generators. It
works for me.
PDF - The PDF output just seems smarter, more compact, better.
Migration to SGML - FrameMaker+SGML is out there if you need it. Think
of Maker+SGML as the outlining feature in Word, only absolutely
configurable, and able to produce industrial-strength SGML.
Template Design - For me, it just feels more solid and easier to set up.
Once the templates are set up, the author can predict how they will
behave.
No macros - That means no viruses. I have gotten Word documents from
clients that contained viruses. I'm sure the people who sent them were
well-meaning. However, as far as I'm concerned Word doesn't have a
macro feature either, because I NEVER turn it on. Just call me paranoid.
Oh, I have more reasons, but I don't have the time to spend on it. Go
to the FrameUsers web site at
http://www.frameusers.com/
You're bound to find links to some documents that treat this in more
detail. Also, all above comments are entirely biased. I am a certified
Frame-Weenie, and like all *normal* people, I approach new software with
dread - which means I undoubtably *resist* learning Word. (Please -
this is a normal and exaustively documented phenomonon, which accounts
for the marketing strategy used by MS to flood the market with Word and
Windows, among other products... It works, but I got into Maker before
Word.)
Cheers, and I hope you make the right decision for your situation.
*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com
TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, July 15-18 in Washington, DC
The Help Technology Conference, August 21-24 in Boston, MA
Details and online registration at http://www.SolutionsEvents.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.