Automatic glossary/index builder?

Subject: Automatic glossary/index builder?
From: "Hart, Geoff" <Geoff-H -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:44:38 -0500

Justin Ressler wonders: <<... if there is a decent program that
automatically builds/compiles a glossary or index.>>

No such thing currently exists, though if you define index entries yourself
as you write the document in Word, Word can then automatically build these
into an index. See the online help for details on how to use Word's indexing
features; they actually work quite well. What you're calling an index is
actually a "concordance" (list of words and where they appear in the
document), and Word lets you build concordances automatically (use
"concordance" as the search term in Word's online help). The problem with a
concordance is that it only shows the word (but not any synonyms), doesn't
include important cross-references, and doesn't provide any context for how
that word is being used. Since all these features are essential in a good
index, you're doing your readers a strong disservice if you only provide a
concordance*. Similarly, you can't automatically build a glossary, because
glossaries contain definitions, and unless you define each word the first
time it's mentioned, there would be no way (short of hyperlinking to an
online dictionary) for any software to create a useful glossary.

* The obvious exception is that literary and historical researchers often
need to find out every place that (say) someone's name is mentioned, and for
these workers, a concordance is very valuable indeed. For this reason,
you'll find comprehensive concordances for major literary figures (e.g.,
Shakespeare) and the Christian bible.

--Geoff Hart, FERIC, Pointe-Claire, Quebec
geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
"User's advocate" online monthly at
www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/usersadvocate.html

Hofstadter's Law--"The time and effort required to complete a project are
always more than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's
Law."

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Archive a Word Document in Word 97?
Next by Author: Using a gerund phrase for procedure topic titles? (Take II)
Previous by Thread: The end of the road for ForeHelp
Next by Thread: Should vs. Will, Must and Can


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads