[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: Training inclusion of TWs

Subject: Re: Training inclusion of TWs
From: Victoria Camgros <vcamgros -at- persistence -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:53:31 -0800

At 01:42 PM 1/15/2002 -0600, Charles Incharge wrote:

What has been everyone's experience with training inclusion as a writer?

Generally, my employers have been between ok and generous when it comes to including us techcommies in training. Sometimes, we have had to ask (have you asked?) to be included. I probably don't have to tell you to have your justification ducks in a row when you do ask.

Sometimes, TPTB don't see how a particular training session can be helpful to us. It's up to us to educate. And yes, sometimes they just don't think it's worth the dime.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Attention ForeHelp and Doc-to-Help Users! Upgrade your existing product to RoboHelp for FREE, through January 15th. RoboHelp can import your existing Help projects! Learn how else RoboHelp can benefit you. www.ehelp.com/techwr

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
Training inclusion of TWs: From: Charles Incharge

Previous by Author: Re: Technical Writers Needed for API Doc: Really?
Next by Author: RE: Anyone Hide Easter Eggs in Docs?
Previous by Thread: Training inclusion of TWs
Next by Thread: Re: Training inclusion of TWs

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads