Re: Got Process?

Subject: Re: Got Process?
From: "alan wilde" <awilde2 -at- houston -dot- rr -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 06:50:27 -0600

Andrew Plato brings up an interesting point:

> How would you develop a documentation process that can assess the
> relevance, value, accuracy, and clarity of a set of complex instructions
> and automatically reject information that fails to meet these critera?
>

Isn't that what the verification/validation phases of the process are
designed to achieve? Comparing design inputs (requirements) with design
outputs (documents)?

Alan Wilde
_________________________________________________
>


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
Re: Got Process?: From: Andrew Plato

Previous by Author: Re: Got Process?
Next by Author: Re: dreaded Word HTML
Previous by Thread: Re: Got Process?
Next by Thread: Re: Got Process?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads