TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Resumes with grant experience From:jrondeau <jrondeau -at- OREGON -dot- UOREGON -dot- EDU> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:13:42 -0800
Nora,
You must be looking at/thinking about whole different worlds of TW from mine.
I've lost count of how many positions I've seen that included grant writing as
a desideratum (oops, is that too fancy a word? ;)). Annamaria cheered you on
-- let me give you a hearty second! Not least b/c you so clearly understand
how grants work, why they're important, etc. etc. etc.
Jennifer
>===== Original Message From Nora von Gerichten <wlg -at- pacificcoast -dot- net> =====
>Because of the threads on resumes, I have been reconsidering mine.
>
>I have done lots of R&D engineering grant writing where the emphasis was on
>writing rather than technology. Grants give pedigree to a project that
>frequently leads to higher quality investors. Is this a good thing to
include?
Yes, yes, and more yes.
>
>If I include samples of the process (as required in grant applications) in
>my portfolio, and include the award amounts, seems to me it might be a good
>selling point. What say you?
See above.
>
>My track record with grant applications is excellent. No one has every
>been denied one that I wrote the application for. Grants are often nested,
>so that once one is awarded others become available for larger amounts. I
>have gotten about 15 clients at least one grant, the average is three.
>However, this is a very different kind of writing, as formats, styles, etc.
>are codified by whatever the granter specifies, usually most uncreative,
>and little to no TW involved.
Well then, what DO you call TW?
>Nora von Gerichten
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.