Re: STC Letter to the Editor

Subject: Re: STC Letter to the Editor
From: SteveFJong -at- aol -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 18:12:30 EST


No comment, Andrew, that three of your four "reforms" are irrelevant"?

>> [An] STC award, in my mind, does not make a person an accomplished
>> communicator. It may make them an accomplished designer
>> or desktop publisher - not a writer ... In most "writing" contests,
>> if you merely dressed up somebody else's work, you
>> would be promptly disqualified.

That's because, in your mind, you assume that writers only format, not write.
I wish you would not believe so strongly your own marketing hype; it's rather
insulting to the rest of us.

As for the competitions being "a sham," you set an unreasonable standard. I
think you missed my point that companies routinely release products without
getting user feedback. To do the kind of analysis I alluded to in my previous
reply--which assesses not just the documentation and its accuracy, but also
the product--would require access to the product (and, by your suggestion
actual end users.) That service would be extremely valuable to companies,
because it would be so rare.

(There's a business plan in there, if you care to go for it.)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: STC Letter to the Editor
Next by Author: Re: STC Letter to the Editor
Previous by Thread: Re: STC Letter to the Editor
Next by Thread: Re: STC Letter to the Editor


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads