RE: STC Letter to the Editor

Subject: RE: STC Letter to the Editor
From: "Cathy Walter" <cd -at- dpcgroup -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:06:43 -0600


Andrew Plato wrote:
"That's sad. Because if those writers actually listened, they might learn
something valuable. And then they might realize that knowledge - even about
a seemingly unconnected issue - is valuable."

Does this argument carry through to knowledge about subjects you consider
useless? Single-sourcing? Tool talk? Font-fondling? Just curious. ;-)

------------------------------------
Cathy Walter
Technical Writer 972-582-0778
DPC Group, Inc. 972-582-0798 fx
www.dpcgroup.com
------------------------------------



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: STC Letter to the Editor: From: Andrew Plato

Previous by Author: Re: what I recently heard
Next by Author: RE: Tools Question
Previous by Thread: Re: STC Letter to the Editor
Next by Thread: RE: STC Letter to the Editor


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads