Re: FrameMaker Vs Word

Subject: Re: FrameMaker Vs Word
From: eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:11:07 -0500




Mike O.:
<<On the other hand, if you want to convince management to go with
Frame, show them HTML created with Word vs. HTML created with
Frame (using their native export filters; no third-party HTML
generators!).>>

Why not use third party filters? Seeing as the best third party tools for Frame
give you HTML, MSHTMLHelp, MSHelp, HTML Help, and a plethora of other options.

Eric L. Dunn




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

Order RoboHelp X3 in November and receive $100 mail in rebate, FREE WebHelp
Merge Module and the new RoboPDF - add powerful PDF output functionality
to RoboHelp X3. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: FrameMaker 7.0 and XML/structured docs
Next by Author: Re: Proof that content is more important than style
Previous by Thread: Re: FrameMaker Vs Word
Next by Thread: RE: FrameMaker Vs Word


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads