Re: Now is the winter of our dis-CONTENT (was Content vs. Style)

Subject: Re: Now is the winter of our dis-CONTENT (was Content vs. Style)
From: Anthony Davey <ant -at- ant-davey -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:38:49 +0000


Robin,

I have to agree with you that both style and content are important. As a TW that specializes in producing marketing and editorial material for technical products my style is part of the content. If my style isn't part of the content than it becomes reduced to the efforts of 'some bloke in the office, who knows something about the product, trying to document it'.

If style wasn't an important part of the content then we'd all be out of work because anybody could do it!

Best regards,
Ant (ant -at- ant-davey -dot- com)


R. Johnson wrote:

I never wanted to join this conversation because 1) the
content vs. style conundrum is a non-issue-they are *both*
important in terms of communicating information (knowing
WHAT to communicate as well as HOW best to convey that
information is what differentiates technical writers from
other types of writers, IMO); 2) I was enjoying my status
as a semi-lurker.







^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

Order RoboHelp X3 in November and receive $100 mail in rebate, FREE WebHelp
Merge Module and the new RoboPDF - add powerful PDF output functionality
to RoboHelp X3. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Now is the winter of our dis-CONTENT (was Content vs. Style): From: R. Johnson

Previous by Author: Re: Technical meaning for autonomous?
Next by Author: Re: Documenting for the non-typical user? WAS: Fields arranged as a s entence
Previous by Thread: RE: Now is the winter of our dis-CONTENT (was Content vs. Style)
Next by Thread: Re: Now is the winter of our dis-CONTENT (was Content vs. Style)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads