Style/standard question

Subject: Style/standard question
From: Tammy VanBoening <Tammy -dot- VanBoening -at- netRegulus -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:17:40 -0700


Working under the given: that that no apostrophe is used with plural
acronyms, for example, ABCs and GIs, not ABC's or GI's, what happens when
the "word" in question has just one letter--for example: Michael got all A's
in grammar class vs. Michael got all "As" or "A"s in grammar class. Without
the apostrophe, of course, the word looks like "as", but I do mean more than
one A.

I am running into this when documenting one of our web-based applications.
Am I consistent and stick to this rule no matter now many letters are in the
acronym, or am I apparently inconsistent for clarity's sake and use the
"hacked" form when the acronym is a single letter. And to take it a step
further, for an A, A's is definitely more clear than As, but for something
like an X, is X's more clear than Xs or. . . .

Thanks.

Tammy Van Boening
Senior Technical Writer
NetRegulus, Inc.
303-925-7721 (Direct)
303-925-7700 (Main)
303-662-9320 (Fax)
tammy -dot- vanboening -at- netregulus -dot- com
www.netregulus.com




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A new book on Single Sourcing has been released by William Andrew
Publishing: _Single Sourcing: Building Modular Documentation_
is now available at: http://www.williamandrew.com/titles/1491.html.

Help Authoring Seminar 2003, coming soon to a city near you! Attend this
educational and affordable one-day seminar covering existing and emerging
trends in Help authoring technology. See http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l2.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: OT: Re: Are you a "Mental Gymnast"?
Next by Author: RE: small invoices, big egos
Previous by Thread: Re: Brainteasers as hiring indicator (was Re: Bringing "Mental Gymnast" back On Topic)
Next by Thread: Re: Style/standard question


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads