TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: How to handle when the scope changes? From:brian_das -at- hotmail -dot- com To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 16 May 2003 11:24:31 -0600
It's spooky as hell, isn't it? I hope my earlier post didn't seem like I
was criticizing how you handled the beginning of this project. With the
detail you just provided, it sounds like you were pretty clear about it.
So, if I asked your client if they *knew* they were getting a deal on the
first part of the project, what would they say? That might be the key to
the dilemma. If they don't know (or have forgotten) that they're getting a
deal, a price increase might seem oppotunistic. Perhaps your negotiation
could start with getting your client to agree that the first part of the
project was at a reduced rate. You could also get them to agree that the
knowledge you gained from their training is of value. From that position
of agreement, you can proceed from a position of strength.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.