TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RAD, in theory, speeds the development process, so the thinking is that you
need more writers to keep up with that effort, especially if they are to be
involved in an ideal way by physically sitting with developers, attending
design meetings, etc. Now, we could get off on a tangent about RAD and
whether it really works, etc., but given this topic, I have just gathered
this research..
-----Original Message-----
From: Ami WRIGHT [mailto:ami -at- ziplink -dot- net]
Lisa,
In your opinion, does using Rapid Application Development tend to mean that
you need more tech writers, or fewer tech writers?
-Ami
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
