TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: What to look for in a technical editor From:Michael West <mbwest -at- bigpond -dot- net -dot- au> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 22 May 2003 12:36:20 +1000
No, no, no. Please read my words, not his, before
you decide whether we agree or not.
I did NOT say that to "work with a SME who's also a
good editor" would be frustrating.
What I said would lead to frustration was the EXPECTATION
that your avarage SMEs will be competent technical editors (as
distinct from content reviewers).
I also said that exceptions exist, and it's a GOOD thing
when you find someone who is both.
So we agree.
--
Michael West
----- Original Message -----
From: <dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: What to look for in a technical editor
>
> Michael West wrote:
> >
> > Expecting subject-matter experts to be intelligent and capable
> > style editors, or expecting style experts to have detailed
> > technical knowledge of an emerging technology, usually ends in
> > unsatisfactory outcomes for the consumer and, somewhat less
> > importantly, frustrating working conditions for writers.
>
> and Andrew Plato asked:
> >
> > ...when I read your words I hear "ignorance is an asset."
> > Why is expecting an editor to have technical knowledge a bad
> > thing and how could [it] lead to a frustrating working condition?
>
> The first part of Mr. West's statement doesn't trouble me. *Expecting* an
SME to be a good editor may indeed lead to an unsatisfactory outcome;
specifically, dissatisfaction--few SMEs are likely to be good editors.
>
> As for the second part, I'm with Andrew. If I get to work with an SME
who's also a good editor, I can't imagine being frustrated as a writer by
the experience.
>
> --David
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.