TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: You're SUPPOSED to have good communication skills if you're a tech writer
Subject:Re: You're SUPPOSED to have good communication skills if you're a tech writer From:"Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- editors-writers -dot- info> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 26 May 2003 23:28:05 -0400
:
: Andrew Plato wrote:
:
: >How then is writing any different. A writer who proudly proclaims he/she is
a
: >good writer is like a doctor saying he understands medicine. YOU"RE
SUPPOSED TO
: >HAVE GOOD COMMUNICATION SKILLS IF YOU CALL YOURSELF A WRITER!
: >
: >
: What I don't understand is the idea that good writing skills can exist
: in isolation.
I don't think that is at all what Michael was saying. No, I don't think he was
saying anything of the sort.
:
: But the need for content is especially important in a genre as practical
: as technical writing - nobody is going to admire the writing skills in
: your manual or help system if there's no content.
Oh, dear. I fear the malady is indeed catching. Nobody said this, Bruce.
Nobody has advocated no content.
This seems such a
: basic point that I feel that I'm being condescending even mentioning it.
: Yet, from the number who think that writing skills are enough, the point
: seems nowhere near as basic as I imagine.
:
Who said writing skills are enough? A technical writer writes about technical
subjects. A technical writer is not a technie wannabe who can't make it as a
technie and cannot write either, but who lords his alleged technical expertise
over fellow writers.
A technical writer does not need to possess vast knowledge about technical
subjects, but needs to be highly interested in them, able to learn them -- as
required to perform the job, and able to write about them with grace and
accuracy. For an expert audience, greater technical knowledge would be
necessary -- that's obvious.
It is utterly absurd to say that a technical writer must possess highly
developed knowledge about a technical subject. That is simply not true. *Some*
technical writers need to possess such knowledge because of their audience,
but not all need such depth in a technical subject. The joy of learning and of
explaining technical concepts to others is sufficient.
Were the whole truth to be told, there is in fact, a good article that could
come of this that would present the various gradations of "technical" that are
indeed responsible for this never-ending verbal battle over whose ox is bigger
and nastier.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.