Re: Unabridged dictionary

Subject: Re: Unabridged dictionary
From: "Mark L. Levinson" <mark_levinson -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 04:52:45 -0700 (PDT)


> How often have you benefitted from having an
> *unabridged* dictionary, vs. something with
> less heft?

YMMV, but I'm glad about three or four times
a year. Mostly for negative lookup. That is,
when I want to be sure I'm right that a particular
word is *not* in the dictionary. (How can I be
absolutely sure if I don't check the unabridged?)

But I have the unabridged hardcopy. Maybe the
online version is more useful or at least more
convenient.

=====
---------------------------------------------------------
mark_levinson -at- yahoo -dot- com or more usually
nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ANNOUNCING ROBOHELP STUDIO

RoboHelp Studio maximizes your Help authoring power by combining
RoboHelp Office and RoboDemo, so you can easily create professional
Help systems that feature interactive tutorials and demos.

Find out more about RoboHelp Studio at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l2

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Kat Nagel's "Life Cycle of Mailing Lists"
Next by Author: A suspected can of worms
Previous by Thread: Re: Unabridged dictionary
Next by Thread: Re: Unabridged dictionary


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads