Re: Single sourcing vs. normalization

Subject: Re: Single sourcing vs. normalization
From: "Andrea Brundt" <andrea_w_brundt -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:23:45 -0400


Hi Mark,

I'm intrigued, but I must admit I'm only familiar with the term
"normalization" as it relates to relational databases. What is "normalized"
content? Can you suggest some resources, or provide more information?

Thanks!
Andrea
----- Original Message -----
Mark wrote:
The recent discussion over the value of single sourcing misses some of the
benefits of normalizing your content that have little or nothing to do with
single sourcing or reuse per se.




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
?Mustang? (code name) is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to Web, intranets, and online Help.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! See a live demo that
will take your breath away: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
Single sourcing vs. normalization: From: Mark Baker

Previous by Author: profanity, translation, etc (Was: Dictionary)
Next by Author: Re: Single sourcing vs. normalization
Previous by Thread: Single sourcing vs. normalization
Next by Thread: RE: Single sourcing vs. normalization


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads