TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: RE: Compensation and productivity? From:Susan W. Gallagher <sgallagher5 -at- cox -dot- net> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 7 Nov 2003 13:26:14 -0500
There's some notable research on what motivates us.
Particularly, the hierarcy of needs developed by Abraham
Maslow in the 1950s. (see http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/maslow.html for more info).
According to Maslow, we humans have certain basic needs that
we work to fulfill, but once the need is filled, it ceases
to be motivational. (e.g., physiological needs such as food
are motivational if you are hungry, but once the hunger is
sated, food ceases to be motivational).
So, according to Maslow, it isn't who you are or why you were
hired so much as what you want and need that
provides motivation. That means that money is only a
motivator if you don't have enough to fulfill your needs.
Interesting stuff, motivation, and a very complex issue.
-Sue Gallagher
>
> From: Sean Hower <hokumhome -at- freehomepage -dot- com>
> > ...What I'm wondering, though, is at a more personal
> > level. In your experience, does better pay increase your
> > productivity? Has it improved the productivity of other
> > tech writers you know?
>
> This depends on a few things, including the work environment.
>
> If I'm working at a place I enjoy, more pay will keep me there _and_ get me to work harder. I feel an obligation.
>
> If I'm working at a place that treats me badly, no amount of pay will keep me there or get me to work harder. That's when I start looking for work elsewhere because I'm obviously not a fit for the company, and the company is obviously not a fit for me.
>
> I'm reading this book "Corporate Cults" ... The author makes a distintiction between hiring on the basis of who someone is vs what they do. If a company hires someone because of who they are, the company isn't necessarily looking for someone who is the best at doing their job, the company is looking for someone that will fit into the corporate culture. If a company is hiring someone because of what they do, the company isn't necessarily looking for someone who plays nicely with others, but who can get the job done...
>
> Anyway, in this discussion on compensation and productivity, it would seem that depending on why you were hired (who you are vs what you do) would determine the things that would make a person more productive. For example, if you were hired because you were a groovy dude, getting more money wouldn't make you work harder, but getting to walk around in bare feet might (just throwin something out as an example). If you were hired because you were a master at what you do, walking around in bare feet wouldn't make you work harder, but getting more money might.
>
> Thoughts?
RoboHelp for FrameMaker is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to online Help, intranet, and Web.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! Call 800-718-4407 for
competitive pricing or download a trial at: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l4
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
