TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Felice Albala wondered: <<I recently started a contract for which my
skills matched the job descrip perfectly. I now see that the job
descrip was inaccurate and this job requires skills I don't have. If I
quit or get fired I must pay my vendor the equivalent of 80 hours to
offset his loss of face with the client.>>
Ouch! I hope your contract doesn't specify this last condition; if it
does, find another vendor once you get out of the current situation.
They're imposing a ridiculous contract condition that no contractor
should ever have to put up with. On the face of completely inadequate
information, it sure seems like they set out to exploit you, but I'd
never act on that basis without being awfully sure of it. Speaking of
which:
The first thing is to sit down with the client and explain the
situation. If you're willing and able to acquire the necessary skills
and they're willing to give you time to learn them on the job, there's
no problem. First, see if you can get a look at the job requirements
they sent to the vendor. Try to avoid explaining why you're asking if
you can avoid doing so, but if you can't, be honest. A good client will
understand the situation and help you through it.
If the vendor knowingly altered the client's requirements in an attempt
to hire a less-skilled worker (you) at a lowball price, then they acted
fraudulently and misrepresented the situation to you in the contract. A
good lawyer would nail them for this in court. Although your "vendor"
does have the right to protect their "face", any vendor who acts in
this manner deserves to have their face ripped off--not just lost.
The only way to find out the true situation is to talk to the client.
If they honestly communicated the client's requirements, then the
client is the one who misrepresented their requirements and needs to
fix the problem.
--Geoff Hart ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca
(try geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com if you don't get a reply)
SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo
From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.