RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???

Subject: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
From: "Jim Shaeffer" <jims -at- spsi -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 10:42:43 -0400


4 different but related answers:

1. When the job is to communicate, rather than just to write, we want to
tweak the total message that we are conveying, not just the text.
2. Look, feel, fit and finish seem important (especially since we have
been spoiled by WYSIWYG interfaces for years now.)
3. Going to strict mark-up seems like going back to the days of ASCII
characters on green screens. That's uncivilized!
4. We have been trained to organize meaning by organizing the document
structure (outlines, headings, etc.). In our minds, these organizational
structures are visual, not conceptual. If we can't see the differences
in the headings, the differences don't exist.


This message in only partly tongue-in-cheek.

Jim Shaeffer


Bill Lawrence wrote, in part:
>
> I note (with no small amount of consternation) that many writers, when
> considering going to XML, are looking for WYSIWYG authoring tools.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Re: Cover letter feedback
Next by Author: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Previous by Thread: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Next by Thread: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads