RE: RE: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???

["Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>]

Well yes, it would if there were still any of them
left (I suppose there may be in some companies), but
my experience is that "production people" were all
pretty much done away with when writers all got stuck
with becoming "one-writer shops" whether we're the
only person on the doc team or not.  That's why I
continue to be nostalgic for the days when I actually 
got to spend the majority of my time as a writer 
actually researching and writing content.

Gene Kim-Eng



------- Original Message -------
On Tue, 18 May 2004 13:15:07 -0400 Mailing List wrote:


Oh, ok. But to me, on the other hand, it sounded more 
like the "production people" you describe in your first 
paragraph.

For those of us in one-writer shops or with just a few 
writers on the team, we don't have "production people"


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content 
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo 

>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.