RE: RE: RE: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???

Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: 18 May 2004 21:28:02 GMT


As someone who started out using DOS based WP programs
and coding www in Notepad, I second this. In fact, if
I had to author simultaneously for print and online,
I'd want an authoring tool that could display *all*
my final outputs simultaneously as I work in an editing
window. The technology to drive multiple monitors has
been out for some time; why should the gamers be the
only ones to get something from it?

Gene Kim-Eng



------- Original Message -------
On Tue, 18 May 2004 13:47:20 -0700 Laurel Hickey wrote:

Long live WYSIWYG!


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: RE: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Next by Author: Re: Drop term "user's guide"?
Previous by Thread: RE: RE: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Next by Thread: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads