RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???

Subject: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
From: Chris Gooch <chris -dot- gooch -at- lightworkdesign -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 11:22:59 +0100




Maybe it will clarify if we introduce some new terms:

WYSIWYM - What You See Is What You Mean

WYSIAYG - What You See Is All You've Got
WYSIWTCS - What You See Is What The Customer Sees


WYSIWYM is a Very Good Thing. It can be as graphical as
you like, that's not quite the point.

WYSIAYG, and WYSIWTCS, are Bad Things. Generally speaking
most WYSIWYG systems mean the latter and therefore degrade
to the former.

Defending WYSIWYG as being a means to provide a really
useful top-notch WYSIWYM system (Chris D, Laurel, maybe
others) misses the problem that others have with WYSIAYG.

Does this help clarify the debate?

Anyway, my take is that WYSIWYM could be plain text markup,
or it could be a semantically driven graphical markup system
with intelligent menus etc. -- but traditional WYSIWYG
isn't that.

hth,
Chris.

Christopher Gooch, Technical Author
LightWork Design, Sheffield, UK.
www.lightworkdesign.com



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Next by Author: Re: Paper Manual to Online Help - where to start?
Previous by Thread: Re: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Next by Thread: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads