Re: Dorky grammar question

Subject: Re: Dorky grammar question
From: "nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il" <nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 03:36:14 -0400


Gene writes:
> But there are no grammatically correct circumstances
> under which "rules" in "set of rules" can be the
> subject. None.

For the verb in question, the subject is not "rules"
and the subject is not "set". The subject is "that".
The question is whether "that" refers to the set
(singular) or to the rules (plural). Grammatically,
it could refer to either.

Mark L. Levinson
Herzliya, Israel
nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Before the Rays
Next by Author: regarding the pardoning of her french
Previous by Thread: RE: Re: Dorky grammar question
Next by Thread: Re: Dorky grammar question


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads