Re: filesystem or file system?
Bruce Byfield wrote:
> At any event, in talking about spelling, "correct" is a concept that has very limited relevance. Writers should be more concerned about what the audience expects.
Yes.
That's how spelling changes. At first, a new spelling is strange and considered incorrect, then it gradually catches on and becomes acceptable.
The problem is that an audience is made up of individuals. Is a spelling right just because a majority uses it? What happens when
members of the minority, users who may very well be more literate and sophisticated, recognize it as incorrect?
Then they complain about the lowering of standards, a few insist on spelling it the way that they have declared is correct, then complain even more about how their expertise is ignored.
Seriously, prescriptive grammar has never been very successful in imposing its standards. Nor, in my opinion, should it ever be. Prescriptive grammar is all about writing correctly. Despite the claims of its advocates, it has nothing to do with writing well. You can follow all the rules of prescriptive grammar and write correctly, and still write a dull or useless piece of work. By contrast, you can write something riddled with mistakes and inconsistencies, and still write effectively or thoroughly. Obviously, the conscientious try to minimize the mistakes so as not to distract from what they are saying, but that is more a matter of consistency than of always following prescriptive rules.
At any rate, to describe the minority as "literate and sophisticated" is a circular argument. In this context, both words mean "well-versed in the standards of the minority." So, really, what you are saying is that they know what they know. Grammar isn't like the laws of physics; there is no external, objective frame of reference for determining what is right.
You might be interested in my article on the subject at:
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/magazine/writing/grammar.html
And even if "filesystem" was far more common, I think it could be argued that "file system" is easier for anyone to read. This can be especially true for ESL readers who may lack the intuitive sense of where to break a compound word.
In the case of ESL readers, you may have a good reason for splitting the word - unless, of course, they are used to seeing it as one word in technical English. It all depends on your audience.
--
Bruce Byfield
http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
Follow-Ups:
- Re: filesystem or file system?, Nora Merhar
References:
RE: filesystem or file system?: From: Johan Hiemstra
Re: filesystem or file system?: From: Bruce Byfield
Re: filesystem or file system?: From: Lee Hunter
Previous by Author:
Re: filesystem or file system?
Next by Author:
Re: filesystem or file system?
Previous by Thread:
Re: filesystem or file system?
Next by Thread:
Re: filesystem or file system?
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads