TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Information architects? From:Mailing List <mlist -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:40:24 -0400
> Geoff Hart opined:
[...]
> The thing to remember about labels is that like all other words,
> they're tools for communication. Speaking as an editor, I'd gently
> remind you that not everyone--including writers--uses these tools
> particularly well. But those who use the tools precisely communicate
> things that the duffers can't communicate.
I used to think that, but now I'm not so sure.
It's certainly true that those of us who can see certain
distinctions and have the tools to enunciate them are
able to do so, but if the general audience has lost the
knowledge and tools necessary to understand the distinctions,
then can we really be said to have communicated them?
(For that matter, can someone who can't understand the
description of a distinction be said to perceive the
distinction itself?)
I mean, it's all very well that I can write in a precise
manner, using words that convey fine shades of meaning,
and that you can pick up every last one (and vice versa,
I hope)... but neither of us is the target audience for
our usual professional scribblings.
At about this point, somebody is already frantically waving
their hands in the background, looking for an opportunity
to chime in with "blah, blah, commandment, blah, know your
audience, blah, write to your audience".
But that's my point being missed.
Many of us now realize that if we write anywhere near our
well-rounded capabilities, we'll be talking over the heads
of much of our audience (not in here, on the list, nor on
CE-L, but our workaday audience "out there"). The technical
terms and concepts might be known and understood, but certain
ways of talking about them -- certain words and phrases that
used to be perfectly good (and ARE still perfectly good
among a discerning audience) -- no longer carry distinctions
and are now considered interchangeable with other words.
We can mention comprise/compose (as they just did on CE-L
this morning). We can talk about little things like "e.g."
and "i.e." that I learned in gradeschool, but which I'm
now told are too esoteric for manuals and help that will
mostly be read by engineers and technical sorts.
Any of us could go on and on about various bits of dumming
down, and I'm sure the equivalent is occurring in other
languages, even as we speak... er, write.
A related point, I was going to acknowledge that there are
several PhD holders in this list, so there's no shortage
of well educated sorts, but then I've been known to help
PhD candidates with their writing, since their education
was too narrow and technical, it seems, to cover stuff that
I acquired during substantially less formal instruction.
And, before that person waving the hand pipes up again,
I'm not referring to PhD candidates with English as a
second language... well, maybe second to C++ or bio-speak,
but not second to French or Urdu. You know what I mean.
Oh, crap. Was that a rant? Sorry. :-)
Kevin
--
The following text added by my employer, outside my control:
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be
privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by replying to this message, and then delete it from your computer without
copying or disclosing it.
ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.