Re: Why so few medical techwriters

Subject: Re: Why so few medical techwriters
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:02:15 -0700


I am of the view that neither education (book-learning) or formal training
(which is really still "book-learning," but just targeted more narrowly)
can be as effective as an equivalent amount of OTJ training/experience
when it comes to making you more marketable as a professional (I am
not addressing the obvious but sometime intangible value of either as a
mind-expanding experience). However, given the times we're currently
living in, a writer or would-be writer looking for opportunities to grow
or make a career shift may have an easier time obtaining education or
formal training, both of which can be bought and paid for, than finding
an employer willing to hire and underwrite either education or training
of any sort. Sometimes your options are limited.

Gene Kim-Eng


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Byfield" <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com>

> However, I would suggest that people who are looking for training shouldn't
> deceive themselves that they are getting an education. They may attend an
> educational institute, and they may even take classes with people who are being
> educated, but they are doing something very different in focus and scope than
> getting an education. You are only deceiving and cheating yourself if you
> imagine otherwise. If you imagine that you are educated when you are only
> trained, then you are missing a chance to develop your mind - and may never know
> what you are missing.
>
> (The same is true, of course, in reverse. You can get an education, and still
> not have any training, as countless English majors turned tech-writer can
> testify, including me. However, that's not a viewpoint being raised in this
> discussion, so I'm not emphasizing it).



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date: 8/19/2004

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
re: Why so few medical techwriters: From: Sean Hower
Re: Why so few medical techwriters: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Why so few medical techwriters: From: Bruce Byfield

Previous by Author: Re: Transition from employee to consultant--any gotchas?
Next by Author: Re: School vs experience... Was: Why so few medical techwriters
Previous by Thread: Re: Why so few medical techwriters
Next by Thread: Re: Why so few medical techwriters


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads