Re: and then

Subject: Re: and then
From: "Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- granatedit -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:02:31 -0400


Dick Margulis wrote:
> Bonnie Granat wrote:
>
>
>> So, I remain mystified. (Well, Cambridge may well be just wrong. It's
>> not impossible, although it's more likely that *I* am wrong, but I
>> haven't yet seen an explanation of why I am wrong, if I am wrong.)
>>
>
>
> Bonnie,
>
> I think you've fallen into the Purism trap. You are thinking (only
> momentarily, I hope) of grammar as a logically consistent,
> mathematically perfect set of prescriptivist rules rather than as the
> much more flexible underlying structure of a human language.
>
> However, the fact that it _sounds_ wrong to you is a clue that this
> is a construction in transition from not acceptable to acceptable.
> You're not comfortable with it, so you will avoid it; others _are_
> comfortable with
> it and see nothing wrong with using it. Those who write and edit from
> the point of view of wanting to offend/confuse/startle the fewest
> number
> of people will probably continue to eschew the construction for some
> time yet. Others who are less concerned about that issue and just want
> to push the language along a bit faster will use it as they see fit.
>

Professional writers and editors need to either use professional
standards or give up the right to call themselves "professionals."


Bonnie Granat
www.GranatEdit.com
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Mobile: 617-319-7461
Office: 617-354-7084



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: and then (was: Silly but important to me): From: John Wilcox
Re: and then (was: Silly but important to me): From: Bonnie Granat
Re: and then: From: Dick Margulis

Previous by Author: Re: and then (was: Silly but important to me)
Next by Author: Re: and then (was: Silly but important to me)
Previous by Thread: Re: and then
Next by Thread: Re: and then


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads