Re: and then

Subject: Re: and then
From: Dick Margulis <margulisd -at- comcast -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 16:06:40 -0400




Bonnie Granat wrote:

[big snip]


Professional writers and editors need to either use professional
standards or give up the right to call themselves "professionals."



I'm not sure where you're going with that, Bonnie. Choosing informal diction when it is appropriate to the audience and situation is something professional writers and editors do all the time. If you are suggesting that only formal diction is worthy of being called professional, we'll have to agree to disagree.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: and then (was: Silly but important to me): From: John Wilcox
Re: and then (was: Silly but important to me): From: Bonnie Granat
Re: and then: From: Dick Margulis
Re: and then: From: Bonnie Granat

Previous by Author: Re: and then
Next by Author: Re: leading into a list
Previous by Thread: Re: and then
Next by Thread: Re: and then


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads