Re: Not done on the blank page yet!

["Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>]

We don't use this in our documents, and in a situation in which I had
a free hand to decide whether to do it or not, in the absence of any
arguement from someone in favor of using it, I wouldn't.  However,
the original question came from someone who was asking for help
in making a "case" for why it should be removed.  My point was,
it's not a change I'd consider worth making much of an effort to do
if I was going to have to "sell" it.

Gene Kim-Eng


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wright, Lynne" <lwright -at- positron911 -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 10:59 AM
Subject: Not done on the blank page yet!


>
> Well, but if several of you are saying that its a convention that is so
old,
> nobody really knows why it started, then I'd say its absolutely valid to
> re-consider whether it needs to be perpetutated any more by the original
> poster.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l 

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.