Re: Nipping Noses (Was: Not done on the blank page yet!)

["Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>]

And as near as I could see, so were all of the answers.  The question
asked was whether there were any reasons why the message might
have to be kept, and what arguements could help make the case to
remove them.  The question produced replies that provided reasons
why the message might be needed, reasons why it could be removed
without doing any harm and some opinions about whether it would be
worth a great deal of effort to make a change.  As in most discussions,
everybody's responses reflected in part their own experiences, and
as the discussion went on people started talking to each other and not
just to the original question.  An open forum is not a FAQ; there's
nobody editing out the background noise, and when you ask a question
you're inevitably going to have to sort through the resulting discussion
to glean whatever useful information there is to be found.

Gene Kim-Eng


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jones, Donna" <DJones -at- zebra -dot- com>


Your questions were perfectly within what is expected and allowed on this
forum.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l 

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.