Re: Fw: Help with Help

["T.W. Smith" <techwordsmith -at- gmail -dot- com>]

>Frame -> RH -> HTML is much better, but again, somewhat laborious

That is bad, I agree, and expensive. The Word route ... how would you
ever justify that with WWP around? The Word route must have been
really expensive, especially compared to a WWP solution.

Instead, use FM -> WWP -> HTML.

If the content exist in FrameMaker, then RoboHelp really is not the
best solution.

On Apr 1, 2005 1:28 PM, Poster <Poster -at- aurora -dot- cotse -dot- net> wrote:
><snip> 
> I've used Frame -> Word -> RH -> Winhelp and that just sucks (that's
> because Word is so freaking unstable, and the image conversion issue).
> 
> Frame -> RH -> HTML is much better, but again, somewhat laborious.
> 
> I've used an older version of Webworks and evaluated HTMLTransit and
> have played with Mif2Go. Of all of these, RH seems to be the easiest
> to use for HTML-based help, but then again, I'm no Mif2Go guru.


======
T.

Remember, this is online. Take everything with a mine of salt and a grin.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.