TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Fw: Help with Help From:"Poster" <Poster -at- aurora -dot- cotse -dot- net> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:55:58 -0500 (EST)
T.W. Smith said:
>>Frame -> RH -> HTML is much better, but again, somewhat laborious
>
> That is bad, I agree, and expensive. The Word route ... how would you
> ever justify that with WWP around? The Word route must have been
> really expensive, especially compared to a WWP solution.
I never really considered WWP, because their past versions sucked
major. Maybe they're better now.
> Instead, use FM -> WWP -> HTML.
>
> If the content exist in FrameMaker, then RoboHelp really is not the
> best solution.
Not if you want to generate Winhelp, it isn't. But geez. Winhelp. I
might as well have been writing docs for the PDP-11. :)
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo: http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
