Re: [C]onfidentiality-notice [R]evocation [A]nd [P]roscription

Subject: Re: [C]onfidentiality-notice [R]evocation [A]nd [P]roscription
From: Mitchell Maltenfort <mmalten -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:42:08 -0400


Remember: lawyers are a cowardly and superstitious lot. To date,
ridicule has no effect on them, but it certainly helps maintain _us_.

This is actually on topic for this list, I think, because Kevin is
talking about an automatic communication we all receive, somebody
wrote it, and the topic is legal and financial consequences of reading
electronic correspondence -- specifically, this list.

Frankly, I find the auto-text a nuisance because if I forget to delete
it when I post, my post is rejected for including too much copied
text.

As a relatively new user to this list, I'd suggest that some of the
legal and other controls be eased a bit -- at least so this list is a
more relaxed environment than whatever we might each find on-the-job.
much the same way that a professional conference is also more relaxed.

On 7/22/05, mlist -at- safenet-inc -dot- com <mlist -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> wrote:
>
> G'day all,
>
> Is anybody on this list aware of any _real_ positive value
> of the notices that so many of us have pasted to the bottoms
> of our e-mails?

>
> I'm pretty sure that those blobs of self-important bumpf-harrumpf
> text have no force in law. Is there any non-urban-legend
> example where such a notice was instrumental in saving somebody
> or some company from material loss or embarrassment?

> Can we start a campaign to pound some sense into the
> heads of the corporate types who mandate this low-grade
> fertilizer?
>
> Kevin (whose every mail is blessed with a non-grammatical blob,
> automatically attached by our outgoing servers)
>


--
I can answer any question.
"I don't know" is an answer.
"I don't know yet" is a better answer.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
[C]onfidentiality-notice [R]evocation [A]nd [P]roscription: From: mlist

Previous by Author: Re: Information needed on property and casualty (P&C) insurance in the US
Next by Author: Flow-charting question
Previous by Thread: [C]onfidentiality-notice [R]evocation [A]nd [P]roscription
Next by Thread: Re: [C]onfidentiality-notice [R]evocation [A]nd [P]roscription


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads