TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: The second person in user guides From:Edwin Skau <eddy -dot- skau -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"List,Techwriter" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Sat, 3 Dec 2005 18:36:53 +0530
Hi,
I'd suggest creating a table where you have a dozen or so typical
sentences from your manual in the two styles mentioned. See if the
"you" adds value. I usually feel it doesn't.
In the imperative mood, the "you" is implied anyway. Adding a you
makes it redundant, and sometimes seems to imply a "hey!" (as in, "Hey
you! Click that there button!).
-edwin
On 12/3/05, Sagendorph, Wallace <wis8 -at- cdc -dot- gov> wrote:
>
> A good fin-de-2005 to everyone:
>
> The editorial staff where I work is preparing a comprehensive,
> all-inclusive style manual that definitively (we hope) addresses all of
> the weightier matters connected with document preparation. Because this
> manual is primarily for editorial use and because most of our authors
> will not bother to thumb through a 100+ -page tome looking for answers
> to their writing-mechanics questions (an observation based, by the way,
> on years of empirical data) we have also prepared a 27-page author's
> companion guide that hits the common problems we encounter in usage,
> punctuation, capitalization, abbreviation, acronyms, references and
> citations, and so on.
>
> Some have suggested that to engage the readers, we should write the
> companion guide in a breezy, casual style using the second person ("you
> should do this," you should not do that," "your document should
> include," blah, blah). Others say this is tantamount to an approval of
> such usage in formal documents, and is unnecessary in any event --- the
> imperative mood ("do this," "don't do that") works as well or better,
> and it does not imply that "you" and "your" should find their way into
> documents released to publications or the public.
>
> Your comments (;>) please.
>
> Wallace
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
> Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
> project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
>
> Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
> content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
> proprietary editor! *August release. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as eddy -dot- skau -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/eddy.skau%40gmail.com
>
> Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-