TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Evaluating Candidates Using Tests, Logic Questions, and Similar
Subject:Re: Evaluating Candidates Using Tests, Logic Questions, and Similar From:"Julia Countryman" <julia -dot- countryman -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"Sharon Burton" <sharon -at- anthrobytes -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:07:00 -0800
I can see your point, and reading body language is important, but I don't
think I'd disqualify them on body language alone, unless it was something
full of attitude like a big sigh and lots of eye rolling. I guess the part
that bothered me is the implication of the lack of trust in a person's
portfolio and references for their ability to write. I'd much rather be
asked what my thought process is rather than through a test--interviews are
stressful enough as it is.
I find it interesting that writers want to edit the test--you might want to
rethink the test into a format that targets what you want them to do? It
might save you and your interviewees a lot of time.
Julia
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sharon Burton" <sharon -at- anthrobytes -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:41 PM
Subject: RE: Evaluating Candidates Using Tests, Logic Questions, and Similar
> It's not a trick or gimmick. I explain that we have a short writing test
that
> should take no more than about 20 minutes. I'm not looking for spelling or
> grammar, it's a 1st draft. What I am looking for, I say, is your logical
> approach and how you structure information. This is not the only thing
looked
> at in this interview but it is a part.
>
> (what I get is people editing the text they are supposed to be rewriting
for
> grammar and spelling. Despite the fact that I tell them this is not
important
> and the instructions asy it is not important. That's what most writers do.
> sigh)
>
> When someone sighs and shakes their head, I think I have a problem
> child. We're
> _writers_ and it's not at all a surprise that you should be asked to take
a
> _writing_ test. My husband is a journalist editor and he gives
interviewing
> reporters writing tests all the time because these are _writers_ and a
certain
> level of writing has to be there.
>
> I don't really want to hire people who make an obvious face and act as
> tho this
> is beneath them. If this is beneath them, then what else is going to be a
> problem? The writing test is a small part of what I'm considering but it's
to
> be expected that we would do this since you are in fact looking for a
> _writing_
> job.
>
> And what else am I going to ask of them as employees that they don't like?
I
> can't only give assignments that are fun. How do you handle stuff you
don't
> like? During the interview, everyone is on the best behavior. If you are
> willing to act like that on your best behavior, then what are you like
> when you
> are comfortable?
>
> sharon
>
> Sharon Burton
> CEO, Anthrobytes Consulting
> 951-369-8590
> www.anthrobytes.com
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-