TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: How many levels of indents and heads are reasonable?
Subject:Re: How many levels of indents and heads are reasonable? From:Yves JEAUROND <jingting -at- rogers -dot- com> To:techwr-l List <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:27:50 -0400 (EDT)
Last Tier?
To reduce the number of indents, not every topic has to be numbered ( gasp! ). The topics in the last tier (or indent) of your structure can use a "definition style" for short, highly structured expository topics. It creates a ghost of an indent. If they are a bit longer, adding a subhead might even be sufficient. It also informs the reader that there are no more numbered indents.
Another is to remove the First Level and make it a chapter heading.
The simpler, the better???
To reuse John Posada's excellent example for the last tier.
1.0 Databases
1.1 Database1
1.1.1 Overview
1.1.2 Specifications
Permission. [subhead or definition & procedure] // no numbering
Attributes. [ " ]
Stored Procedures [ " ]
Triggers [ " ]
Indexes [ " ]
Replication [ " ]
1.2 Database2
1.2.1 Overview
1.2.2 Specifications
Permission [see above]
Attributes [ " ]
Stored Procedures [ " ]
Triggers [ " ]
Indexes [ " ]
Replication [ " ]
1.3 Database2
1.3.1 Overview
And so on...
John Posada <jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com> a écrit :
> Asking how many levels of indents and heads are reasonable
> is asking how big of a system is it reasonable to document.
I don't agree. I propose that you can define the number of levels you want to stay within, then structure your documentation to fit within that definition (and I think this is pretty much a mandatory definition when you are defining your DITA schema).
Take the two examples...I've picked the subject of databases because in an enterprise system, databases and their documentation can be huge:
Granted...this was an example off the top of my head, it was a simple, and it only eliminated 1 level. However, in my opinion, the levels of any document set can be kept to a minimum...just takes some thought and effort.
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
"They say everyone needs goals. Mine is to live forever.
So far, so good."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as jingting -at- rogers -dot- com -dot-
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-