TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Documentation Correctness was Re: How many levels ofindentsandheads are reasonable?
Subject:RE: Documentation Correctness was Re: How many levels ofindentsandheads are reasonable? From:"Butler, Darren J Ctr 584 CBSS/GBHAC" <Darren -dot- Butler -dot- ctr -at- Robins -dot- af -dot- mil> To:"Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:30:45 -0400
Gene Kim-Eng stated: The best discussion the "TW acedemic or industry
communities" can have on this subject is to help writers learn how to
identify companies with such development processes in time to avoid
joining them in the first place.
Would it be fair to say that a company's TW department has some level of
responsibility in (at least attempting to) point out any short-comings
and errors of the developmental process? The TWs may be the only "canary
in the coal mine" to alert that things are going horrible wrong -- just
before we pass out.
I guess it all depends on whether or not the documentation is parallel
to product development or an after - (w-a-a--y after) - thought.
Have any of you successfully fostered process-change?
-----Original Message-----
From:
techwr-l-bounces+darren -dot- butler -dot- ctr=robins -dot- af -dot- mil -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+darren -dot- butler -dot- ctr=robins -dot- af -dot- mil -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot-
com] On Behalf Of Gene Kim-Eng
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 10:43 AM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Documentation Correctness was Re: How many levels
ofindentsandheads are reasonable?
Offhand, I would say that most people in the TW field understand,
instinctively if not explicitly, that if a "rigorous analysis" has not
been conducted to identify "the essential tasks to be performed"
and "the interrelationships between the tasks" by the developers
before development reaches a stage where there's anything to
write about, then the product or system being developed is going
to be inherently "disjointed and incomplete" (in other words, bad),
documenting it six ways to Sunday will not correct its basic
conceptual and design faults, and the document team's energies
will probably be better spent polishing up their resumes and
interviewing skills and looking for their next jobs or contracts
instead of trying to become substitute project managers and
engineers.
"Successful" and "quality" documentation doesn't turn a product
whose development process is bad into a good product, it just
makes it easier for readers to quickly realize that the product is
bad. The best discussion the "TW acedemic or industry
communities" can have on this subject is to help writers learn
how to identify companies with such development processes
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-