Value of giving up numbering in Word?

[Tim Mantyla <TimMantyla -at- nustep -dot- com>]

I've been beating against a brick wall on numbering too. I've gotten some 
instructions and ideas from list members and they are too hard to do or 
take too much time to do with repetitive keystrokes, copying, F9s, etc. 
Some i haven't tried because I'm too burned out on the others that seemed 
easy but really took hours to figure out, try, and I'm still testing in 
Doc-To-Help, which I don't know how it will affect them going through it. 
It seems at first glance to have changed them to C1H numbering from SEQ 
fields originally, which could be problematic.

This issue has taken up way too much of my time, and my supervisors are 
pushing for completion while this issue hangs over me, sucking up more and 
more time.  I'm considering either:

 - manually numbering the many lists of instructions (maybe 20-30 lists of 
5-19 lines of instructions?) or
 - doing away with numbered instructions altogether (probably 
quicker--just reformat them).


Does anyone avoid numbering in a list of many--from 5 to 15 or 
more--instructions? How is that working out? 

What is the great value of numbering instructions anyway? Is there a 
realistic, evidence-based concern that the reader will lose his way, or is 
this just a convention that tech writers do without considering the 
alternative--not using numbered lists at all?


Got some instructions on macros and SEQ and LISTNUM in the techwhirl and 
other archives. It took me a few hours to learn and try the SEQ fields, 
and I had limited success, except that the numbers aren't formatted the 
way I want them...e.g., like 1) or 1.  They just show up as "1" and "2" 
right nest to the text. I'm just getting burned out on all the research 
and testing needed to implement this whole thing. I really feel frustrated 
about it, and angry that Microsoft can't just get it right after so many 
years.

The Shauna Kelly thing is way too involved to try. It's way too much work 
to get this to work, it should just be a setting adjustment in Word and 
have it STAY, ROVER, STAY. This is not a dog with its own free will, it's 
a computer program designed to do what we command it to do.

I just want something SIMPLE, QUICK and it ALWAYS WORKS in EVERY 
CIRCUMSTANCE. Which is why I'm thinking of not dealing w/ numbering. Don't 
do it, no hassles.

Just look at the Vast Mess of Alternative Solutions available. Who knows 
what works and what doesn't, and why? Who has time to test all these? With 
all this controversy in public on the Internet, why isn't Word just fixed 
already?

Here are some solution excerpts:
----------

Subject: Re: Word Templates & Numbered Lists - VBA? SEQ?
From: dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 14:05:00 -0700

> need help with making sure numbered lists work properly.

Several of us have posted instructions on using SEQ fields to produce
absolutely dependable numbered lists. Unfortunately, I can't find ANY of
them in the Techwr-L archives <:( so here's one I posted...

======================================================================
Here's how to get solid numbered lists every time:

For the first item in a NUMBERED list:

{ SEQ numlist \# "0" \r 1 \* MERGEFORMAT }

...
----------
Subject: Re: Word Templates & Numbered Lists - VBA? SEQ?
From: suzy -dot- davis -at- doi -dot- vic -dot- gov -dot- au
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:28:41 +1000
Hi Ardene

Pre-XP I used SEQ numbering, and developed a SEQ numbering tool in VBA
(with a friend who was a better developer at the time) which inserts the
SEQ number field for the selected level to the selected paragraph(s).
There is also a button which removes the SEQ fields and associated spaces
and tabs from selected paragraphs. And if the selection already has some
numbering, either SEQ fields or other is removes them and adds the 
selected
SEQ field level.
I worked on a lot of tender responses so I loved using the SEQ field 
method
because it gave me control, and I liked it better when it became a more
automated process.

Since XP I discovered that if you build your outline number styles through
the user interface they can be reasonably stable as long as you define the
numbering via the level 1 style's numbering definition. (If you want me to
elaborate more on that give me a yell).

But the most stable way since XP is to build your styles and outline lists
via VBA, and I have now developed a tool which does this. You store all
your style style and numbering definitions in a spreadsheet, and I've 
found
this works very well, and is very stable. Helps with managing clients
template definitions as well.

If you are interested in either of these tools, please contact me 
off-list.

regards
Suzy Davis
Create Space Pty Ltd
e: suzy -dot- davis -at- createspace -dot- com -dot- au


WhittleseyA -at- dekalblibrary -dot- org 
Sent by: To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> 
bounce-techwr-l-165345 -at- lists -dot- t cc: 
echwr-l.com Subject: Word Templates & Numbered Lists - VBA? SEQ? 


09/10/04 01:08 AM 
Please respond to WhittleseyA 

I'm developing a template in Word for a training manual, and need help
with making sure numbered lists work properly. I'm curious about how
people have done it so I don't have to reinvent the wheel. What's better -
Word macros? VBA? SEQ fields?

I'm currently working in Word 2003 on Windows 2000.

I've read the MS Word MVP article on how lists work, but can't seem to
find anything on the web describing how people use various tools to do
this.

Thanks for your assistance.

Ardene Whittlesey

--------
From: "Stuart Burnfield" <slb -at- westnet -dot- com -dot- au>
Subject: Re: Seq field solution?
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Message-ID: <380-2200834645428634 -at- westnet -dot- com -dot- au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1


I followed the advice on the Shauna Kelly site, and this page in
particular:
http://www.shaunakelly.com/word/numbering/OutlineNumbering.html

The Word MVPs site is also very good:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Numbering.htm

No need for SEQ fields, and so far, so good.

Stuart
---------
These macros and SEQ field solutions look very time consuming, tried the 
SEQ insert thing and it takes too many keystrokes with F9 just to insert 
these.


I just want a simple solution.  Is there one? The best solution looks like 
giving up numbering altogether.


Tim 

---------
> From: jopakent -at- comcast -dot- net
> Subject: Seq field solution?

> I've done this too many times to be beating my head on this AGAIN!
> 
> I thought I'd mastered Word's numbering "joy" to the extent that I'd
> be able to set up a simple set of Heading 1, 2, & 3 that would 
> number as 1.0, 1.1, & 1.1.1, but after a week of on again off again 
> performance I'm approaching ga-ga-land.
> 
> As this is a new gig and a new set of opportunities, my first 
> response to seeing that I am going to be working with Word and 
> nested, numbered headings was to do some Google searches on seq fields. 
> 
> Alas, I didn't really find a solution that worked. I know that seq 
> fields work pretty well (we used em for numbering appendix figures 
> and tables in my last gig), but what I was hoping to find was 
> something that would be somewhat automatic once I set it up. I 
> thought I'd be able to define a numbering level, associate it with a
<snip>
> --
> J. Paul Kent 
> 206-383-0539
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 21
> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 17:38:15 -0500
> From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>
> Subject: RE: Seq field solution?
> To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
> Message-ID:
>    <0ADA9A22B5BC2147B360A22FD2BAD25C0104689C -at- RMGBEX01 -dot- rmg -dot- local>
> Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Sounds like a job for AutoNumLgl fields, which update automatically
> according to their place in the document hierarchy. I always use them
> for numbering headings (usually for figures and tables, too). Just as
> solid as SEQ fields, and you don't even have to press F9!
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jopakent
> > Subject: Seq field solution?
> > 
> > ... I thought I'd mastered Word's numbering "joy" to 
> > the extent that I'd be able to set up a simple set 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or 
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007 
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.