TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Value of giving up numbering in Word? From:"Leonard C. Porrello" <Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- SoleraTec -dot- com> To:<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:14:31 -0700
A strange analogy. I doubt the third step in a sequence will have a hard
time in life or feel neglected if I fail to assign it (or would you
perhaps say "him?) a number. Do you really ascribe each step in a
procedure the same ontological value as a child?
As I said in my first post, procedures are denoted by a unique bullet
style (an arrow in my case). Unordered lists are denoted by a simple
round bullet. It's not terribly complicated. It is not confusing.
Leonard C. Porrello
SoleraTec LLC
www.soleratec.com
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+leonard -dot- porrello=soleratec -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+leonard -dot- porrello=soleratec -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- c
om] On Behalf Of Edwin Skau
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 11:03 AM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Value of giving up numbering in Word?
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Leonard C. Porrello <
Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- soleratec -dot- com> wrote:
> Good question. Perhaps "add little or arguably nothing to _my docs_"
> would have been better than add "absolutely nothing."
>
> But I am not saying that numbering is always unnecessary. My
procedures
> are short enough to not require numbers. Yours, obviously, are more
> complex and require numbers. I am big fan of dogma only when it comes
to
> religion. Otherwise, I prefer responding to the exigency.
Apparently we seem to believe that numbering only serves to keep track
of
long procedures. That's almost like saying, If I have a dozen kids, I'll
need names to address them. With just two or three kids I can just refer
to
them by gender or size.
>
>
> In response to Dan, the primary auto number problems I have have to do
> with single sourcing. Help & Manual doesn't support renumbering of
> embedded topics. And, last I checked, it doesn't pick up auto
numbering
> from where it left off if there is an intervening graphic or style.
>
> So, I can drop single sourcing and manually number steps that arguably
> gain nothing from numbering, or I can spend my time improving the docs
> in other ways. If numbering--in my docs--was necessary or I had an
> infinite amount of time (and had nothing better to do with it than to
> number lists that don't require numbering), I would use numbering.
>
>
So how do you distinguish between the ordered and unordered lists in
your
document?
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-